December 1, 2022

Looking for the best interval workout? Here it is

Scientists and coaches have long known that boosting a runner’s vo2 max is just about the surest way to help him/her run faster. But what’s the best way to improve your vo2 max? Well, with interval training, of course. That’s been largely agreed-upon for 70 years. Which leads to the next question: What’s the best interval workout to increase your vo2 max? 


A new paper tackles that problem head-on. It gave healthy young male runners one of three different interval workouts that they performed 24 times over an 8-week period. Here are the workouts: 4 x 4 minutes at 95 percent of MAS (max aerobic speed) w/ 3 minute “active breaks” between repeats; 12 x 20 second sprints at 150% of MAS with short 10 second passive breaks; and 10 x 30 second sprints at 175% MAS with long 3.5 minute active breaks. 


We’ll call these three workouts HIT, SIT20, and SIT30. HIT stands for “high intensity training” and SIT is “sprint intensity training.” 


All subjects received a number of different tests before and after their 8-week training programs. The test we’re most interested in was a 3000-meter time trial. The HIT runners improved significantly more on that test (by 5.9%) than the SIT runners. Although SIT20 was an impressive second, apparently because the very short rest periods made the workout almost as continuous as the 4-min repeats. (The SIT20 also did the best job of the three workouts at improving 300-meter sprint times--a good thing to have if you’re a serious track competitor.) 


The researchers concluded: “HIT 4 x 4 intervals are superior at increasing vo2 max compared to SIT protocols … and should be the recommended interval format for aerobic performance.” Also, SIT20 workouts “may be a supplement for enhancing the anaerobic fraction of events.”

 

They added an important note about SIT training. It’s really hard, to the point where it might not be advisable. “Subjects reached absolute exhaustion during the SIT intervals,” with some experiencing “nonsevere adverse effects” such as nausea, vomiting, and dizziness. “Therefore it should be questioned if the extremely intense and fatiguing nature of SIT is appropriate” in all populations. In other words, don’t try SIT workouts unless you’re fit and highly motivated. More at Scandinavian Journal of Medicine & Science in Sports


How do you know you need a recovery day?

We all know our training plan must include hard days and easy days. But what’s the right ratio between them? Should it be 1:1 or 1:2 or 1:3, or some other ratio? Other important, related questions: How should this ratio change by training volume and intensity, or by age and sex? 


Endurance expert Alan Couzens thinks a measurement like morning heart rate (or HRV, heart rate variability) is the way to go. Check every morning, then decide on your training for the day. It’s a simple, objective measurement. “It's silly to set your training plans to arbitrary cycles of load & recovery (3:1, 4:1 etc),” Couzens notes. “Your body's readiness for training is cyclical, but not predictable, even for a very stable athlete. In other words, take recovery when your body says, not when ‘the plan’ says.” 


But Couzens’s tweet drew a contrary view from another exercise expert, Inigo San Millan. He responded: “In many instances when an athlete is fatigued it may be [too] late and it’s key to be ahead of it. I always go with a plan and check multiple parameters, especially blood biomarkers to check that training is assimilated correctly.” 


They both make good points. I lean toward conservative approaches, so I favor San Millan’s perspective. But it couldn’t hurt to also include HRV as part of your evaluation process. 


Should you fast, or fuel up, for afternoon/evening runs?

There’s been a fair amount of research into morning runs performed after an overnight fast (while you’re asleep.) For the most part, these runs increase your fat burning (which could be a good thing) but decrease the performance of your run. That is, you probably go slower and/or shorter, and don’t feel as good. So there are pros and cons to the unfueled morning run. That’s why some coaches and exercise physiologists recommend that you do both to maximize both endpoints--fat burning and performance.

 

Much less is known about afternoon runs while you are fed vs underfed. Here researchers compared subjects who performed an endurance test (at 6:30 pm) after 7 hours of fasting (since an 11:30 am lunch) or 2 hours after a 540-calorie meal. Results? The 7-hour fasters ended the day with a 440-calorie intake deficit vs the 2-hour runners, so the approach might help you lose a few pounds. In addition, the 7-hour fasters burned more fat while running. “However, fasting also reduced voluntary performance, motivation, and exercise enjoyment.” So, once again, there are two sides to the strategy. More at Int J of Sports Nutrition & Exercise Metabolism. 


6 sports nutrition myths, including a view on fasting

There’s a lot of confusing, often contradictory, and not-evidence-based sports nutrition information all across the internet. Here sports nutritionist and former elite cyclist Anne Guzman notes 6 that she labels “myths.” You’ve probably heard that moderate caffeine/coffee consumption doesn’t dehydrate you; Guzman agrees with that, and offers some context.  


Most interesting is her thinking about intermittent fasting and training while fasted--in the morning before breakfast, for example. (Or as just discussed in the above item on afternoon/evening workouts.) Guzman doesn’t think these will do much for your weight loss efforts. However, she adds: “I'm not dogmatic about not training fasted since there is some interesting science around the adaptive response to training fasted related to metabolism.” More here. 


Simple workouts can be powerfully productive

Some workouts are unusually successful because they are simple, hard (and therefore effective), and also well named. They’re easy to remember, and they get the job done, which encourages you to return to them with some regularity. The best example of this is Yasso 800s. 


David Roche came up with another one recently, primarily by naming it well--“The Power Hour.” Who doesn’t want more power? Who isn’t willing to give up an hour to achieve more power? Roche and his wife, Megan, define their workout as follows: “The Power Hour is something between a normal tempo run and a race simulation, starting moderate and ending hard, ideally over race-specific terrain.”


You can’t go wrong by trying this session now and then (but not too often), so what are you waiting for? The article got stuck behind a paywall at Trail Runner but is free at Yahoo.  


A sneak peak at the new book Born To Run 2

You would have expected this book a decade ago. After all, the original anti-shoe, pro-Tarahumara best selling adventure tale came out in 2009. Most writers and publishers would have launched the “how to do it yourself” edition a couple of years later. But Chris McDougall is a war-reporter at heart--he lives for the chase and discovery. He’s not your typical “how to” advice author, and I admire him for that. So he held out as long as he could before producing B2R2. 


But eventually his coach, Eric Orton, or his publisher applied more pressure. Now we have Born to Run 2--one of the clunkiest book titles ever. I didn’t expect to like B2R2, or to learn anything from it. I was wrong on both counts.  


The book is lively and fun--all credit to McDougall’s writing skill. The photography is fantastic. And I definitely learned things I had never encountered in 60 years of reading running material. Especially the strange indoor running form drill powered by “Rock Lobster” from the B-52s. I’ve actually done it a few times at home (with YouTube music), and it’s a good one. The drill is included in this book excerpt at Outside Online. 


The best way to make certain you DO that next run

Many years ago a running coach-friend told me that the most popular page on her jam-packed website was a downloadable 7-day calendar. People printed it out, and put it on the front of their home refrigerator. Never underestimate the power of a strong visual cue. 


Here a runner and exercise scientist explains her personal favorite motivational ideas. I found myself drawn to the visual ones. “Sticky notes on a mirror, alerts on your phone, running gear laid out the night before — will make it as easy as possible to get going when you’re busy.” 


For some reason, my brain clicked an extra notch, and I thought: I bet gross visual cues would be even better. How about running shoes on the kitchen counter or toilet seat? [Report back when you’ve accumulated enough data.] More at NYTimes.com 


Carbs: The never ending story

Research into carbohydrates and exercise performance is never ending, always expanding, and often revealing new insights. Alex Hutchinson recently explained how carbs improve recovery from exercise: There’s no “on-off” switch but rather a continuum of recovery that varies between slow-twitch endurance muscle fibers and fast-twitch power fibers. Also, no surprise, there is substantial individual variation. Read this column, and you’ll know more about the recovery process than you did before. Guaranteed. More at Outside Online. 


The carbs in your diet, or the lack thereof, can affect more than your endurance. Australian sports nutrition superstar Louise Burke has spent the last few years rigorously testing elite race walkers as they try different diets (mainly low-carb vs higher-carb) and then perform all-out time trials to see how the diets affect their performance. Here, she and colleagues did a 6-day diet comparison of the above, plus a group that consumed insufficient calories (Low Energy Availability). They looked primarily for “immune, inflammatory, and iron-regulatory responses to exercise in endurance athletes.” 


Conclusions: The low-carb, high fat diet “elicited small yet unfavorable iron, immune, and stress responses to exercise.” In contrast, 6 days of LEA produced “no substantial alterations to athlete health.” Therefore, “short-term restriction of carbohydrates, rather than energy, may have greater negative impacts on athlete health.” Note well: Burke and other sports nutrition experts are no fans of LEA. Here, they’re just reporting that a short 6-day restriction doesn’t seem to affect health the way longer term LEA has been shown to do. More at Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise. 


Finally, carbs appear a minor factor when strength training, according to a systematic review of carbohydrate manipulation and strength performance. Result: “ Longer-term changes in performance were not influenced by carbohydrate intake in 15 studies; one study favored the higher- and one the lower-carbohydrate condition.” More at Nutrients. 


Top (free) marathon training plans--and non marathon too

The internet is bursting with free marathon training plans (and ones you have to pay for), but some deserve a bit more attention than others. Particularly when they bring a lot of plans together in one place, which allows you to select from a substantial menu.  


Runners World’s first senior writer, Hal Higdon, has long led the way in this department. Even though his programs are also available for $$$ at Training Peaks (with a few bells and whistles), Hal continues to offer them for free on his personal website. So far as I know, he was the first to do so--back in the Dark Ages pre-2000--and his programs have been followed successfully by thousands of runners. Here’s Hal’s basic Training Plan “menu” page. I counted quickly and found at least 50 different training plans. All free. 


Another high-quality source has now followed in Higdon’s footsteps. This is Marathon Handbook, which recently made all its plans free at this webpage. MH also excels at producing a vast number of free runner-advice articles on almost every topic you can imagine. 


SHORT STUFF you don’t want to miss 

>> Is milk better than water for rehydration? 

>> Good news. Your running economy improves with experience. Bad: It gets worse with age

>> Also good/bad: Women athletes gain sense of “power” from big events, but also feel “fear.” 


GREAT QUOTES make great training partners “You have power over your mind, not outside events.  Realize this, and you will find strength.”  – Marcus Aurelius 


That’s it for now. Thanks for reading. See you again in a week. Amby

 

Nov 17, 2022

Intense “block” training produces “superior results” Training programs allow for an almost infinite variation in the key elements--distance, pace, and recovery. One promising but little studied approach can be called the “short block” or “microcycle” method. It challenges endurance athletes with several days of consecutive hard training followed by several days of relative rest. A training program that lasts 3 to 4 months could then include a number of these blocks as it builds toward a peak. 

Here researchers worked with elite athletes--a group that can’t easily improve fitness. They happened to be cross-country skiers. Judging from their vo2 maxes, these skiers were roughly equivalent to runners who could cover 5K in 15:00. While half the skiers served as a Control group that maintained normal training, the other half were asked to do a 6-day Block of hard intervals. [The 6 days actually included 3 hard, 1 recovery, 2 hard.] 

After the 6-day block, the skiers had 5 recovery days, and were then tested for pre- and post-comparisons. The tests showed that the Block skiers improved more than Controls in a 1-minute speed test, and in pace at a predetermined blood lactate level. In this sub-max test, they also had a lower heart rate and perceived exertion.  

Conclusion: “BLOCK induced superior changes in indicators of endurance performance compared with CON.” More (free, full text) at Frontiers in Sports & Active Living. 

Run with an “expert” stride--not a “novice” stride You can’t always “eyeball” a modest, midpack runner vs an elite runner and discern differences in their running economy. You might think you can, but it’s not that easy, since oxygen-consumption takes place internally--not at the foot or elbow or shoulders. It’s especially interesting, I think, to note that a number of today’s top female marathon runners seem to have a lot of wasted motion, particularly in the upper body. They would fail any “expert” appraisal of good running form. But they win the big races. 

Notwithstanding the above, good (efficient) running form tends to follow key principles. In a new paper, researchers looked for differences between “expert” and “novice” runners. Here’s what they found. The experts had a lower duty factor,meaning they spent less time on the ground. They also exhibited less vertical oscillation; ie, they bounced less than novice runners. 

These seem to be valuable running-form goals. And probably more significant than what your upper body is doing. More at Bioengineering

When to return to running post-marathon We all know that the marathon can inflict significant body damage--almost always of short duration--and that we need a good recovery period afterward. But lots of things can get in the way of that recovery, including both exaltation (after a good race) and disappointment (after a bad one). Either might induce you to begin training again too soon and/or too hard. 

There’s no single rule to cover all situations in running, but this is a good time to adopt a simple, all inclusive rule for post-marathon recovery. Better safe than sorry. Here an experienced physical therapist offers sound advice for Week 1, Week 2, Week 3, and beyond. You’ll smile over the instructions on how to walk backwards down a stairway. The author says, “Been there. Done that.” I can echo the experience, especially post-Boston Marathon. More at Finish Line PT. 

Why you shouldn’t do sexy fast intervals or tempo runs British trail runner Jon Albom has been training in Norway in recent years, sometimes with the unmatchable Killian Jornet. And Albom believes he has learned a few important lessons. I appreciated one in particular. 

Albom notes that Jornet doesn’t necessarily aim for the fastest sessions he could run--on easy terrain after a relaxed warmup. Instead he trains himself to run strong when tired. He mimics what racing will feel like.  

Example: Jornet runs tempo-like efforts after pushing himself through some steep uphills and downhills. “It teaches you to run at your honest threshold speed as opposed to your sexy threshold speed,” says Albom. You might not feel good about the read-out from your watch. On the other hand, you might really enjoy your race-day result. More at Athletics Weekly. 

Best therapies for iliotibial band syndrome Iliotibial band syndrome (ITBS) is a frequently seen injury among runners, triathletes and cyclists, producing pain and stiffness on the lateral (outside) edge of the knees. Physical therapists have many tools and modalities to work on ITBS. This systematic review delved into the most successful. 

It concluded that “deep transverse frictions” didn’t seem to work, and “are not recommended.” Trigger point decreased pain and improved function. Both shockwave therapy and dry needling “showed improvement in pain and limb function.” More at Int J of Advanced Health Science & Technology. 

When to skip and when to skip skipping If you’ve got an ankle injury, don’t do skipping as an alternative movement. It produces more force around the ankles than normal running, and will likely aggravate any ankle injury. On the other hand, if you’ve got a knee injury and/or would like to increase your ankle strength, then skipping might work very well. When it comes to the hips, both running and skipping produce “no differences in hip contact forces between gaits.” 

Conclusion: Skipping is “a viable alternative to running if the primary goal is to reduce joint loading at the commonly injured patellofemoral joint.” But not for the ankles. These findings can help clinicians, coaches, and runners choose “activities most appropriate for a patient’s individual training or rehabilitation goals.” More at J of Applied Biomechanics. 

The best exercise routine when you’re 65+ … or even 85 Whatever you age is today, some day you’re going to be 65+. And at that time, you’ll probably be wondering what’s the best combination of aerobic exercise and strength training for the rest of your life.  

A new study looked into that question to provide the answers you want. More than 115,000 “seniors” were followed for 7.9 years to discover what amount of aerobic and strength exercise would provide the greatest longevity benefit. The aerobic benefit was linear--with more being better. Those who logged more than 5 hours a week enjoyed a 32 percent reduction in mortality risk. The strength curve was U-shaped with a 21 percent reduction at 4 to 6 “episodes” a week. At 7+ episodes, this bounced back up to just 2 percent. 

The investigators concluded that continued exercise “is important for all older adults, including those aged 85 years or older.” More at JAMA Network Open. 

High fat dairy = good heart health in Framingham males. Plus, beer for recovery After years--decades? centuries?--of trying to figure out how our diets affect various health markers and outcomes, it sometimes seems we’re more confused than ever. I stuck to the low-fat dairy approach for a long time despite my wife’s protestations and her claims to be reading authoritative authors who are full-fat fans. 

Recently, I switched over, and this new paper from the famed Framingham heart health studies is making me feel good about the decision. It notes that there are different sources of saturated fat, and they might not produce the same outcomes. Here, “Males with higher intakes of dairy-derived saturated fats had a less atherogenic profile than males with lower intakes of these fats.” More at Amer J of Clinical Nutrition. 

Also, on the subject of beverages, let’s look at beer. We know it’s globally popular and often consumed after hard exercise, particularly competitions. But is it actually an okay recovery drink? You probably guessed that someone decided to investigate this question. Here’s the outcome. 

In a comparison of 300mL of water vs beer post exercise, the researchers concluded that “Ingestion of 300 mL of beer did not significantly affect HRV [heart rate variability] and cardiovascular parameters.” But maybe you should stop at one. And be careful if driving home. More at Int J of Environmental Research & Public Health. 

Prior strength training improves hip/knee replacement outcomes Here’s hoping you won’t need a knee or hip replacement any time soon. But since bad things can happen to good people, you might as well be prepared. How? By making sure that leg strengthening work is part of your regular routine. In this systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials, researchers concluded: “Prehabilitation efforts involving progressive resistance training provide an effective means to improve post-operative outcomes.” The more you do beforehand, the better you do after surgery. More at Frontiers in Sports & Active Living. 

The latest on blood boosting with EPO There have been quite a few failed doping tests recently, especially among Kenyans, one or two of whom have links to Eliud Kipchoge. I don’t think this means anything vis a vis Kipchoge, who has a two-decade long record of excellence in the sport. But it is worrisome. 

As are some recent scientific reports. One paper investigated “frequent, small” doses of recombinant EPO. This is the so-called “micro-dosing” believed to be favored by athletes who want to boost their blood while avoiding positive drug tests. The trial was a “counter-balanced, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study design stratified by sex”--nice work. And it concluded that the small-dose EPO shots were sufficient to “enhance aerobic-dominated performance in both trained males and females.” More at Med & Sci in Sports & Exercise. 

You might wonder: What would happen if you let a group of runners inject themselves with a blood-boosting drug called “OxyRBX?” Yep, they’d get faster by a modest but racing-significant 1.2%. Even though the OxyRBX was a sham. A placebo. A nothing-at-all saline injection. More at Med & Sci in Sports & Exercise (2015). 

Important new insights on the exercise-brain connection You don’t take tennis lessons to improve your baseball skills, or expect that bicep curls will lower your half marathon time. Yet we have tended to make overly simplistic links when it comes to exercise and the brain. Until now. 

A new paper on physical activity, memory, and mental health employed “roughly a century’s worth of fitness data” pulled off Fitbits to find that “different physical activity patterns or fitness characteristics varied with different aspects of memory, on different tasks.” In other words, the kind and intensity of exercise you do has different effects on various brain functions and your mental health. 

This is a bit of an eye-opener as few have considered these different connections before. The researchers found, for example, that more active participants scored higher on many memory recall tests, but less active participants performed better on “foreign language flashcard tasks.” 

Stress levels floated in and out of the analysis. “Participants who reported higher levels of stress” tended to be more active, which should have a calming effect. However, those doing light activity were less anxious and depressed.  

On the whole, the researchers found that “engaging in one form or intensity of physical activity will not necessarily affect all aspects of cognitive or mental health equally (or in the same direction.)” Clearly there’s much more to come from this new frontier. 

The paper concludes with a very broad statement, meant to be both provocative and far-reaching. “Our work may have exciting implications for cognitive enhancement. Just as strength training may be customized to target a specific muscle group, or to improve performance on a specific physical task, similar principles might also be applied to target specific improvements in cognitive fitness and mental health.” More (free, full text) at Nature. 

SHORT STUFF you don’t want to miss

>>> Treadmill recommendations directly from runners who use them

>>> Big data shows that low belly fat is linked to “better cognitive performance in both males and females

>>> Sprint the straightaways, jog the curves. Because body forces are much higher on the curves 

GREAT QUOTES make great training partners “We are what we repeatedly do. Therefore excellence is not an act, but a habit.” --Aristotle 

That’s it for now. Thanks for reading. See you again in two weeks. Amby