February 1, 2024

“Move It To Improve It”--How Exercise Makes Almost Everything Better

How long has it been since I reminded you that “Motivation is job one.” Too long, I think. 


Happily a recent New York Times article gives me good reason to return to a favorite topic.


The Times asked a group of experts why we make so many exercise “excuses” and/or erect “mental blocks” that interfere with our fitness plans. And how can we overcome these blocks to increase our workout consistency?


For beginners, says How To Change book author, Katy Milkman: Stop calling them “excuses.” That self-critical term leans too close to shame, an unhelpful burden. Instead, plan, plan, plan. Devise a complete strategy or series of action steps. 


That is, always know what you’re going to do next. Forget about the excuse that’s pushing you toward not doing. Forge on to Plan B.


Also, don’t obsess about the cold, the expense, the time-crunch you’re feeling, or various aches and pains that might accompany your exercise program. With all the fitness alternatives surrounding us these days, there’s always a way to deal. Again: Be prepared.


The best advice of all came from Edward Phillips, a Harvard professor of physical medicine and rehabilitation. “If you remain sedentary, your risk of deleterious health effects is 100 percent,” Phillips said. 


Now, that’s telling it like it is. Anything you do, even 5 minutes, is better than nothing at all. More at NYTimes.


Related: Last week I wrote that we needed a variation on the venerable  “Use it, or lose it” phrase that’s popular among regular exercisers. “Lose it” is a negative thought that might not prove helpful to some. 


With an assist from RLRH reader M Hanlon, I’ve now got a good variant. Here it is: “Move it to improve it.” It’s a maxim that would be supported by a wide range of health-fitness professionals from orthopedic surgeons to physical therapists to cardiologists to strength and marathon coaches. Last and perhaps most important--mental health counselors.


Tell your friends: “Move it to improve it.”


Should You Let ChatGPT Coach You?

Let’s face it: AI internet tools are intriguing for lots of reasons beyond fake Taylor Swift images. For example,, untold numbers of runners have wondered if AI could provide a useful training program. For free, or close to free


Naturally, a group of running researchers also wondered the same. So they devised a simple test to find out. 


The researchers “invented” a beginning runner who was training just twice a week for a total of 10 miles/week. This runner then asked ChatGPT for a 6-week training plan that would “improve performance.” 


The runner made two requests, known as “prompts” in the AI world. The first was short and simple. The second included more information about the runner, including his usual heart rate during runs, his desired improvement (3 to 5%), his use of a treadmill and smartwatch, and so on. 


The ChatGPT output--its training plans--were next submitted to a group of running coaches with a masters degree in sports science, and at least 5 years of coaching experience. The coaches rated the GPT training programs on 22 criteria that were drawn from existing scientific papers. 


The big question: Are “training plans generated by ChatGPT appropriate and in-line with recent scientific evidence, and do the AI-derived training plans differ based on provided input information granularity?”


Result: The ChatGPT training plans were not highly rated by the expert coaches, but received additional points in proportion to the depth and specificity of the prompting. The more you tell ChatGPT about yourself and your training goals, the better the advice you receive. Yet even the best ChatGPT plans were “not rated optimal.”


Conclusion: “We advise avoiding the use of ChatGPT generated training plans without an expert coach’s feedback. ChatGPT currently does not cover many aspects which are relevant in a coach-athlete relationship such as motivation, monitoring, and training plan adjustments.” More at J of Sport Science & Medicine with free full text.


New Research: Better Breathing Can Improve Endurance Performance.

It’s no secret or surprise that you have to breathe optimally to perform well in endurance sports. In fact, I would have assumed that all elite athletes do this quite naturally on the way to attaining top performance. . 


However, that’s not the finding of a recent examination of 69 “elite endurance athletes” who were compared with 44 healthy non-athletes. On a battery of pulmonary function tests, nearly 45% of the elites exhibited “dysfunctional breathing patterns.” 


The big problem? They weren’t using “a diaphragmatic breathing pattern, which is associated with better pulmonary function test results,” and more oxygen delivery to the legs when the respiratory muscles become fatigued. The diaphragm is a dome-shaped muscle just below the rib cage and above the stomach.


The researchers concluded: “It may be important to incorporate breathing exercises into an athlete's training to help develop a proper breathing pattern and thus better exercise performance.” More at Nature with free full text.


Here’s a simple YouTube video explaining how you can learn and practice diaphragmatic breathing.


Yes, You Can Get Faster In The Marathon

The runners from Minnesota Distance Elite aren’t among the favorites in Saturday’s U.S. Olympic Marathon Trials in Orlando, FL. But it’s not for lack of top coaching. Coach Chris Lundstrom qualified for 3 Marathon Trials himself, and has a PhD in kinesiology with an emphasis on, you guessed it, running performance. 


Several years ago he published a paper that followed veteran 3-hour marathon runners as they prepared for their next 26.2-miler. This is an interesting group because we all know it’s not easy to continue improving in the marathon after you reach a certain fitness and performance. 


Lundstrom investigated runners in their mid-30s with previous marathon bests around 3 hours (males) and 3:30 (females). He wanted to determine how much their physiology and performance would change in yet another 12-week marathon buildup. 


Here’s what he found: The biggest difference was a drop in percentage of body fat, from an already-low 18.7% to 16.7%. This, along with their training, allowed the runners to achieve a significant improvement in their vo2 max--a key determinant of marathon success.


The runners trained an average of 53 miles a week with just one workout that was rated a “quality session.” Their Relative Perceived Exertion of training level on a weekly scale was a modest (even low) 4.8 on a 1 to 10 scale.


You wouldn’t use the word “hard” to describe this level of marathon training. These runners simply trained consistently to get ready.


So how did the runners perform in their goal marathon races? It varied considerably, as they raced in different locations with different weather. 


Most did not improve their best times of the previous 2 years. Two did run impressive times, however. Their improvements stemmed largely from a big jump in their vo2 max after the 12-weeks of training. 


Conclusion: “Maximal aerobic capacity can increase in this population, which is already well trained.” It helps to train consistently and perhaps drop a couple of pounds. However, you won’t necessarily run a fast followup marathon unless you pick a fast course with good weather. More at J of Human Sport & Exercise with free full text.


Running Builds Strong Bones In Mid-Life Athletes

Running generally builds stronger bones, particularly of the lower body … except when it doesn’t. Bone fracture risk is high in teen runners, especially among  females who don’t fuel sufficiently. Under-eating male adolescent runners also face higher risks. 


But what about in midlife when one wants to build strong bones as a hedge against any future osteoporosis? How are those runners doing in the bone-health arena? A recent paper looked at bone mineral content and density in 212 runners (average age in the early 40s) vs 110 age-matched non runners who did not meet global recommendations for physical activity.


The reviewers analyzed the two groups in terms of “cumulative loading rate” on the bones. This cumulative load was almost twice as high in runners vs non runners. We often call this “pounding.” It can lead to some injuries, but it can also promote greater bone strength and health. 


Result of the current comparison: Bone mineral content and bone mineral density of the runners was significantly higher than the non runners. That’s important because “the objective of the middle aged population is to maintain or slow the reduction in bone mineral density.” The enhanced bone health was true only in the lower body, not in  the lumbar spine.


Conclusion: “We recommend running as a suitable physical activity, supplemented with other activities, such as building muscles, including the back muscles, to promote

bone strength in the spine.” More at J of Sports Medicine & Physical Fitness with free full text.


Maybe Ketones Are A Functional Brain Food--Not A Body Fuel

The Keto or ketogenic diet gained much of its early notoriety for its potential to enhance weight loss and endurance performance. The first of these has produced modest supporting evidence, but the second not so much--at least not for endurance athletes. Now the field seems to be shifting from the body to the mind. 


This shouldn’t be a big surprise, as the strongest support for a keto diet comes from studies of epilepsy, a brain disease. 


Researchers are currently digging into other possible links between a keto diet and our mental states. In his newsletter, Physiologically Speaking, Brady Holmer explains that ketone esters could limit brain fatigue, thus improving ultra-endurance performance in events where your mental focus is just as important as carbs-glycogen to keep you going. 


A deep new report at National Public Radio quotes a number of experts in the field of psychiatric medicine. They are intrigued by the possibility that ketogenic manipulations could reduce symptoms of bipolar and depressive disease. This is a long way from hard science, but there are a number of serious trials under way.. 


Proponents of “functional nutrition” believe we might someday come closer to understanding how specialized diets could improve the health of individuals with specific conditions. This is a long step from carbohydrate-loading for marathon runners, but it’s an area receiving increased attention.  More at NPR. 


Marijuana Makes Runners Feel Better, But Run Slower

As marijuana becomes legal in more states (and countries), we’ll see increasing research into how the long-debated substance affects mind and body. Some of the investigations will be exercise studies. Here’s the latest. 


A University of Colorado team had previously found that up to 80% of local exercisers had also used marijuana before or shortly after exercise. (Colorado legalized usage a decade ago.) Now they wanted to test how marijuana changed the running experience.


Did it make the runners “feel” better or worse? Did they run faster or slower?


The answers were a bit of a toss-up. The runners reported more enjoyment and “high” symptoms, and also less pain, when running with marijuana vs without. Also, in a bit of a surprise, their runs were more positive with a CBD-dominant strain than with a THC-heavy marijuana. Generally, THC is thought to produce stronger effects.


However, running on marijuana was also rated more difficult or effortful than without. The runners were slower, perhaps due to marijuana’s tendency to increase heart rate. “It is pretty clear from our research that cannabis is not a performance enhancing drug,” said senior author Angela Bryan.


The researchers are primarily interested in learning if marijuana could boost regular activity among non-exercisers by lessening their perceived discomfort during exercise. More at U Colorado News and Sports Medicine.


Sorry, Ladies: Dark Chocolate Won’t Make You Faster

You can construct a reasonable hypothesis that consumption of dark chocolate before running could boost performance. After all, dark chocolate contains ample amounts of anthocyanins--those strong antioxidant flavonols found in richly colored fruits and vegetables. Anthocyanins might then increase nitric oxide availability, which is thought to increase exercise potential.


Like I said: A hypothesis worth testing. 


So researchers designed a cross-over study with college-age female runners. During one arm of the experiment, the runners received Ghirardelli Unsweetened baking chocolate 2 hours before treadmill testing. At another time, they received the same number of calories of Ghirardelli White Chocolate with no flavonols. (Baking chocolate is known to contain about twice the flavonols of dark chocolate.)


Result: There were no significant differences between conditions for vo2 max or energy expenditure. The dark chocolate had “no effect on running economy or fuel utilization.” Thus, “It cannot currently be recommended to use dark chocolate acutely for the augmentation of running performance.”


Hypothesis denied. Sorry about that. More at Topics in Exercise Science & Kinesiology with free full text.


There remains a small open window for dark chocolate fans. This was an “acute” study, meaning subjects got the dark chocolate only once--2 hours before their treadmill test. It’s possible that regular, “chronic” use of dark chocolate could provide a positive benefit, as has been shown in several tests of male cyclists.


You’ll have to test this hypothesis on your own. Enjoy!


How To Run Smart In The Heat

Here’s a clear, evidence-based heat-running article that you should definitely read right now if you’re racing in the weekend’s U.S. Olympic Marathon Trials.


Okay, I know you’re not. But you should review the article anyway, because it won’t be long before you have to face the challenges of heat running, wherever you might live. 


The most important advice here is: “Modify your training plan.” That’s code for “Run slower.” Along with “Run less,” there’s no smarter  approach to running in the heat. 


Actual heatstroke can be life-threatening, which concerns many. But it doesn’t ordinarily strike runners unless they are highly motivated to maintain a fast pace in hot, humid conditions. For example, in a Marathon Trials competition.


An underlying virus or other condition can also provoke heatstroke, so be particularly careful about not running in the heat if you already feel compromised.


Many of us will suffer from heat cramps or heat exhaustion (but not heatstroke) when the temps/humidity rise too high. These will make you feel like crap, but they’ll also resolve relatively quickly when you do the common-sense thing: Stop running, seek shade, drink modestly, and lower your body temperature, perhaps by pouring cold water over your torso. 


Don’t overdrink when you feel hot, as this could lead to hyponatremia, a dangerous brain-swelling condition. The goal is to cool your body, not to fill it with water or other fluids. 


Also, don’t panic. You’ll almost certainly feel better a couple of minutes after you stop exerting yourself in the heat. 


If no one’s offering you $100,000 to finish your run, don’t continue to push hard . Stop and recover. Don’t regard running in the heat as a toughness test. It’s actually a smartness test. Be smart. More at Marathon Handbook.


SHORT STUFF You Don’t Want To Miss

>>> Elliptical vs treadmill: How well does an elliptical workout simulate treadmill running?

>>> On thin ice: The evidence for Graston technique and prolotherapy is weak, so proceed cautiously

>>> Risk-benefit ratios: Although the benefits of midlife running “always outweigh the risks,” it’s only smart to know your limits


GREAT QUOTES Make Great Training Partners

"The marathon never ceases to be a race of joy, a race of wonder."

--Hal Higdon, writer, coach, and elite marathon runner 


That’s all for now. Thanks for reading. See you again next week.


January 25, 2024

 Jan 25 xx

The U.S. Olympic Marathon Trials are approaching fast--on Saturday, February 3--so this week we’re looking at a few of the high-performance strategies the Trials runners will be using. Along with the usual assortment of training, nutrition, and injury prevention advice. Amby


The Best Tempo Run Ever

The tempo run is a central training component of almost all endurance runners. It teaches you--physically and mentally--to run “hard but controlled.” Those two words are the key to all successful endurance training and racing.


But many things can go awry when overeager coaches and athletes get their hands on the tempo run. In particular, many do tempos that are too long and/or too hard. The “terrible toos” lead to unsuccessful endurance training and racing.


Another tempo-run problem? Relying too much on a strict formula. You think you must do 20 continuous minutes. Or 40 minutes. Or whatever.


Endurance running coach Steve Magness has a better way. He calls it “the split as you feel” threshold run. I’m tempted to call it the “flexible tempo run” or even the “fartlek tempo run.”


Here’s how to do it. First, pick how many minutes of tempo running you want to complete on a particular day. Say, 25 minutes. Second, warm up, and then start your run. Third, evaluate how the run is going. 


If you find that you’re working too hard (not “controlled”) or maybe feeling too muscle-sore, stop your tempo run after X minutes. Jog very slowly for several minutes to recover. Then start up again until X + your second effort = 25 minutes, your goal for the day.


Don’t get upset at yourself for the two-pronged effort. Instead, congratulate yourself for being smart about completing this workout just as it was meant to be--hard but controlled.


Magness notes: “This takes some pressure off the workout, makes it more manageable, teaches you how to listen to your body...while still getting the stimulus for the workout!” Some days you’ll run 20 minutes + 5 minutes, others 15 + 10. You might even end up with a 10 + 7 + 5 + 3. It’s all good. More at X/Steve Magness.


If Supplements Don’t Work, Why Is Everyone Taking Them?

There are going to be a lot of supplements consumed by a lot of marathon runners at the Olympic Marathon Trials. That’s not because there’s a mountain of evidence supporting supplement use. 


It’s because all the Trials runners are looking for every fractional benefit they can find. And you don’t have to go farther than the corner drugstore to find row upon row of vitamins, minerals, and weird combinations of stuff making veiled claims. If you’ve ever heard of the Internet, the possibilities expand to … ???


Why take something of little known value? Because you’ve done it once or twice, or often, and thought you felt better, stronger, faster. And thinking you’ve taken something with magical powers is basically as good as taking something magical. (Though you’d be very stupid to take something that could be contaminated with a banned drug.)


It’s an absolute given that most Trials racers will take some form of caffeine, possibly pre-race and also during the race. Caffeine is the go-to endurance booster around the globe. 


Some will no doubt take a shot or two of beet juice, or a nitrate pill. Various forms of baking soda are a new and popular choice. Creatine has been viewed more as a muscle building supplement, but, hey, it takes muscle to run a marathon.


It’s also a given that more runners will be consuming more sugars (carbohydrates) in more forms than ever before. After super shoes, high-carb intake is the most discussed strategy in endurance sports. A few might veer in the opposite direction to try a ketone ester drink to increase fat-burning.


But here’s the scary thing about all the above: These supplements make you “go.” You know what I mean. 


So if we see an unusual number of runners veer off the road and disappear mid-Marathon Trials, you’ll know why.The total race registration numbers are small; the porta potty lines could be long.


Of course a runner could limit his/her risk of stomach distress by staying away from all the supplements. That would be safer. But it might not elevate you to an Olympian performance, which is why everyone is running the Trials.


It’s easy to be critical of supplement taking if you’re sitting on the sidelines. It’s much tougher--a powerful Catch 22-- if you’re in the Game. 


At Outside Online, Alex Hutchinson explains, correctly, that “most supplements don’t work.” That’s not going to make them disappear, however. In fact, there might be more at the Olympic Marathon Trials than anywhere else. 


Real Life, Real Runner Results From The “Train Low, Race High” Diet

Carbohydrate loading for optimal results has been the Golden Rule for Endurance Performance for over a half century. It has survived full frontal  attacks (like the Keto diet), and also several different manipulations. 


One of those manipulations--Train Low, Race High--has been adopted by many top marathon runners in the last decade. There are several reasons. First, who’s going to get up 3 hours before a typical weekend long run to eat a high-carb meal? It’s easier to just slam a coffee, and get out the door.


Then there’s the alleged performance benefit: Training Low (carb) might teach your body to burn fats more efficiently at the end of a long effort (20 miles or more) when the body is mostly depleted of its carb-glycogen supply. At this point--ie, the last 6 miles of a marathon-- every runner wants to feel efficient and energized vs hitting-the-wall.


The question is: Does the Train Low, Race High approach actually deliver on its promise? A new study, which appears to be the best to date, says No.


It’s a good study because it used highly fit cyclists as the subjects. It lasted 5 weeks, and all the subjects did the same training during that period. The research team includes several well known, highly regarded endurance experts.


Over the 5-week experimental period, half the subjects continued their normal practice of consuming a high-carb meal before training sessions. The other half did 13 sessions in a low-carb state.


Both groups got a little leaner and faster after 5 weeks, but there were no differences between the two groups. Also, neither improved in a time-to-exhaustion test at race intensity. There were likewise no differences in heart race, carb or fat oxidation, or post-exercise lactate concentration. 


Conclusion: “Periodizing the carbohydrate intake in well-trained cyclists during a 5-week intervention did not elicit superior results to an energy intake-matched high-carbohydrate diet.” 


The authors followed up with a modest warning. “Practical application: It should be considered that low energy availability during prolonged periods may cause adverse effects that will eventually compromise sports performance and health.”


There’s a clear message here: Eat healthy carbs to fuel your workouts. Any other manipulations probably aren’t worth the hassle, and might deliver unhappy results. More at Nutrients with free full text.


The Psychological Effects Of Thinking You’re Dehydrated

Just about everyone--runner, coach, physiologist--understands that getting dehydrated by more than 2-3 percent during a long endurance race is a bad thing. Below 2%, the evidence is less solid.


Here researchers used a clever design to see how dehydration under 2 percent affected cycling performance in an all-out 15 minute test after a prior 80-minute endurance effort.


Each subject performed the same protocol twice with a gastric fluid tube introduced into the stomach. They were allowed to drink a bit of water during the 80-minute pre-test, and also had water released (or not) into the stomach. As a result, subjects didn’t know how much total water they had received. 


But researchers controlled the experiment so that each rider did one 15-minute test while fully hydrated, and one while 1.6% dehydrated. They also told the riders when they were dehydrated. With an important twist: They lied 50% of the time.


Sometimes riders were told they were dehydrated when in fact they were not dehydrated. Result: They performed 6% worse thinking themselves dehydrated vs the exact same all-out test when they thought they were fully hydrated.


Alternatively, when actually dehydrated (but told they weren’t), the riders’ performance did not suffer.


Also, heart rates, gastrointestinal temperature, and relative perceived exertion were not different between trials, whether riders were dehydrated or not. 


Conclusion: “This study demonstrated that when participants believed they were dehydrated by ∼2%, endurance performance in the heat was impaired by ∼6%.”


It seems, then, that you should keep aiming to avoid dehydration of more than 2%. But if you’re not sure you’re hitting this goal, try not to obsess about it. A small miss might not have a large effect. More at Physiology & Behavior.


Super Drinking Could Lead To Faster Marathon Times

One possible way to avoid dehydration is to hyper hydrate before your race. This refers to drinking more than normal pre-event, often in a solution that contains sodium or glycerol. 


A recent meta analysis of this process indicated that it can “provide small to moderate improvement” in time-to-exhaustion tests and in time trials (but not in total work accomplished.) The hyperhydration didn’t seem to affect heart rate, perceived exertion, body temperature, or thermal comfort. Sodium was more effective at lowering body temperature than glycerol.


Conclusion: “These results suggest that pre-exercise hyperhydration provides a small to moderate benefit to endurance performance in total time to exhaustion and time trial. I think a fair number of runners will be attempting this at the Marathon Trials, particularly if the day dawns warm. More at Applied Physiology, Nutrition & Metabolism. 


Also likely to be quite popular: pre-marathon cooling vests. Companies are no doubt introducing new cooling vests in advance of a Paris Summer Olympics that could be hot at times. 


Can Time Restricted Eating Boost Health & Performance?

Time Restricted Eating (TRE), generally following a pattern of an 8-hour-eating-window and 16-hours of no eating, has been possibly the hottest nutrition trend of recent years. And there have been good theoretical reasons to support TRE, especially with regards to glucose regulation and healthier insulin levels.


Some runners have been attracted to TRE, hoping it might also help them lose a couple of unwanted pounds and improve their performance. However, a new randomized, crossover trial of 15 male recreational runners aged 18 to 30 found no support for TRE.


During 4 weeks of TRE, the runners consumed caloric foods only between 1 pm and 9 pm. They trained in a structured, controlled way, and were evaluated for changes in weight, “metabolic health,” and performance.


During another 4 week period, the same participants “consumed their habitual diet without any timing restrictions.” 

They were also evaluated by the same measures as just noted.


Results: “Neither condition elicited observed changes in total body mass, fat mass nor fat-free mass between time points.” There were also no significant changes in “metabolic health.” While both conditions produced significant improvement in performance metrics including vo2 max, these improvements did not differ by condition.


Conclusion: 4 weeks of TRE was no better than a traditional diet for weight, fat, or muscle mass. “In addition, TRE  did not offer any additional benefit for improving submaximal or peak exercise capacity in this population.”


There will be many more studies manipulating dietary intake patterns and endurance athlete health and performance. For now, this is a good one, and it didn’t uncover any clear benefits. More at J of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics.


Your Complete Guide To Avoiding Iron Deficient Anemia

Many runners, especially females and/or strict vegetarians, have issues with anemia. And often they don’t realize it. That’s why a simple, complete guide is always a valuable resource.


That’s what dietitian Nancy Clark has produced here. Iron deficient anemia strikes athletes because they “lose iron with heavy sweating, blood loss in urine or via the intestinal tract, and damage to red blood cells caused by footstrikes while running.” Plus young women have monthly periods.


Clark covers “What to do” if you think you might be anemic, and also “Preventing and/or resolving anemia,” and “Iron supplements” that can help. One tip I didn’t realize: “ Taking an iron supplement every other day is as effective as taking it daily.” More at Nancy Clark RD.


The 24 Hours That Will Make Or Break Your Marathon

It doesn’t matter whether you’re a first time marathon runner or an Olympic Marathon champ headed back to the big time for another crack at the gold: You’d better have a solid plan for your pre-race prep. Especially in the last 24 hours.


The ideas presented here are simple. And so essential that I bet many Marathon Trials runners have honed them to the point of fine art. 


Stay prone on a bed as much as possible the day before your race? Not easy for many recreational runners who might be traveling to their event, scouring the Expo, picking up bib numbers, etc. But elite runners are absolute aces in this department.


Lay out your race clothes in several groupings that make it easy to mix and match according to your last-minute weather calculations? An absolute must-do.


Set several alarms, and a backup, and another backup … and maybe several more just to be certain you don’t oversleep. This one is ripe for a comedy skit or funny Instagram video. And everyone will do it.


Make sure you know how to get to the start line, given tight race-morning security, and where the best toilet options are? Frantic, last-second sprints hither and yon are a definite negatory on race morning.


Here’s a solid list of 15 day-before strategies. You’ll regret it if you flake out on any of these. So don’t. More at Run To The Finish.


SHORT STUFF You Don’t Want To Miss

>>> Water, water everywhere: Here’s how to know if you’re drinking too much water, and risking hyponatremia (water illness). 

>>> Got knee pain? Here’s a great infographic to help you figure things out.

>>> How to time your caffeine consumption: The best muscle contraction response occurs 30 minutes after caffeine--not 60 minutes. 



GREAT QUOTES make great training partners

"The more you frame the marathon as a stressful experience, the more negative messages you'll receive. But it's just as easy to frame the marathon as a positively challenging journey."

--Jeff Galloway, U.S. Olympian, running writer, and coach


That’s all for this week. Thanks for reading. See you again next week. Amby