September 26, 2024

Rethink Your Week: Benefits Of A Non-7-Day Training Cycle

It’s hard not to live your life by the calendar. After all, we mostly work on certain days of the week, skip the job on certain days, follow our religious beliefs on specified days, and so forth.


On the other hand, it’s not written anywhere that the perfect training week is exactly 7 days long. In fact, a short training cycle might tempt you to cram in too much.


Let’s see: Gotta go long. Gotta do a tempo day. Gotta set aside a day for speedwork. 


That doesn’t leave much time, in a 7-day cycle, for recovery, adaptation, cross-training, strength-training . . . and, oh, yeah, having a life.


At the Reddit “Advanced Running” forum, several members discussed their personal explorations of non-7-day cycles. “It’s beneficial if you feel like you're not bouncing back fast enough between workouts and long runs,” noted one.


Another wrote: “Fourteen days has been a life changer for me at 41 years old. Every 2 weeks, I do a long run, a tempo run, a short interval run, and a longer interval run.” That’s a powerful training diet that works out to 2 hard days per week on a 14-day rotation.


A third commenter pointed out the harmonious rhythm of a 9-day cycle. “Easy, Easy, Workout, Easy, Easy, Workout, Easy, Easy, Long Run. Repeat.”


I’m not aware of any scientific research on this important “cycle” question. But I’m sure it’s worth trying different plans, especially if you often feel overly fatigued on your current training cycle. More at Reddit Advanced Running.


Find Your Best Racing Shoes This Fall

If you’ve still got time to buy a new pair of racing shoes for your fall marathon or other events, here’s a deep, go-to review. It includes a number of key categories like: best overall, best no-plate shoe, best zero-drop shoe, best minimalist shoe, best trail shoe, and more.


In a surprise move, it even warns you against buying two don’t-go-there shoes.  


I was most impressed by the apparent “stark contrast” and progress of On’s super shoe vs its previous efforts. Not only that: The company has a trick up its sleeve, too.


Since World Athletics limits the midsole foam height of all shoes to 40 mm or less, On followed that regulation. But then it created a PEBA super-foam midsole to add even more bounce to its shoe. 


No rules against that. At least, not yet. Someone at On should get a bonus for this unexpected wrinkle. 


(Of course, we don’t know if a super-foam midsole actually improves a shoe’s overall performance. But it’s still a stealthy move.) More at Run Outside.


Is Ashwagandha The Best New Performance Supplement?

Ashwagandha is rising fast on the list of favorite herbal supplements of strength trainers and endurance athletes. It comes from an evergreen shrub found in parts of India, Africa, and the Middle East. It’s low-cost, appears to have no worrisome side effects, and has proven successful in a number of recent exercise performance trials. 


In a 2012 paper in the Journal of Ayurveda & Integrative Medicine, researchers gave elite Indian cyclists an ashwagandha supplement for 8 weeks, while other cyclists didn’t receive it. Subjects on the supplement enjoyed significant improvements in vo2 max and time to exhaustion. 


A new Ashwagandha study followed a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled design. It fed the supplement (600 mg/day) to 40 healthy and physically active male and female subjects over an 8 week period. Another 40 subjects received a placebo supplement.


All subjects followed the same 8 week program of strength training.  Subsequently, those who received the ashwagandha had greater increases in bench press, leg press, and endurance, which was measured by a vo2 max test. 


Conclusion: “Eight weeks of Ashwagandha root extract supplementation along with resistance training is effective in improving muscle strength, growth and endurance in both male and female participants. Ashwagandha root extract could be a safer, effective and low-cost alternative for athletes to improve muscle endurance.” More at F1000 Research with free full text.


Four years ago, a systematic review and meta analysis of studies with 142 participants showed “a significant enhancement in vo2 max in healthy adults and athletes.”


Here’s an Ashwagandha review from Examine.com, the independent encyclopedia of supplements. It states that “Ashwagandha appears to be safe.” Also, “It’s best known for reducing stress and anxiety. It may also modestly enhance various aspects of physical performance, increase testosterone levels, and improve reproductive health, but more research is needed to confirm these effects.”


The Truth About Exercise & Weight Loss

It’s one of the oldest questions out there, and an important one as well: Is exercise an effective way to lose weight? Or do you have to diet-diet-diet to cut the pounds?


This remains a key question because overweight and obesity are still persistent health issues in the U.S. and around the globe. Sure, you read new stories every day about people losing significant weight with the help of those amazing new GLP-1 drugs (that often cost $1000/month or more.) Still, in the U.S. about 70 percent of the adult population is overweight or obese.


We all know too many people, including family and friends, in this category. They’d be better off carrying fewer pounds. Many are already trying.


But losing weight and keeping it off is incredibly difficult. We live in an “obesogenic environment” surrounded by food, and there are all sorts of “compensation” mechanisms that need to be overcome. 


Here Dr. Scott Lear reviews the evidence and argues for “a combination of both diet and exercise” to lose weight. A key point: Even if you don’t lose as much weight as you’d like, “Exercising and being active has so many other benefits to reduce your risk for diabetes, cancer, heart disease, osteoporosis, stress and improve your mental well-being.”


We should view exercise as its own reward. The bathroom scale isn’t the only important gauge. Exercise will make you feel better, look better, and improve your health. If it also helps you lose a few pounds, that’s a nice bonus. More at Dr. Scott Lear. 


A recent “Brief Communication” in Nature makes many similar points. It argues that “recognizing the broad value of physical activity/exercise in improving health and quality of life of people with obesity is a crucial perspective shift.” More at Nature.


Leaning Forward: Helpful At Times, But Bad At Others 

I first noticed this paper when it won the “Young Investigator Award” at a recent meeting of the German Society for Biomechanics. Someone thinks highly of it, because the full pre-press report appeared very quickly at a journal website.  


The paper reports that leaning forward from the waist while running is good and bad. It’s good because it can reduce “knee joint loading,” but bad because it lowers your running economy.  


The pros and cons of running with a forward lean are much debated among coaches and athletes. Mostly, you hear suggestions that you should lean slightly forward from the ankles. But definitely not from the waist (ie, with your chest and head).


Of course, that’s not a universal truth. You can’t watch a video of Norwegian superstar Jakob Ingebrigtsen without noticing that he has more upper-body lean than most of his elite competitors.


Nonetheless, the new paper claims that trunk leaning could reduce your running economy by as much as 11 percent. That’s a big number.


But it’s not the full story. There are times--when injured, when recovering from injury, when building a big endurance base, etc--that a runner is not principally focused on speed. At these times, you simply want to run healthy.


And a forward trunk lean could help. The German researchers found that each degree of forward trunk lean lowered “cumulative knee joint loading.” In other words, forward trunk leaning reduces stress to the knees.


Conclusion: “Designing load management interventions” based on trunk leaning “seems promising” in certain injury situations. However, you should be aware of a potential “trade off” with running economy. More at J of Sport & Health Science with free full text.


Keto Diet Has “No Disadvantages” For Runners; Could Help

The effect of low-carb (and therefore high-fat) diets on endurance performance has been studied extensively for more than a decade now. The same applies to the use of ketone supplements. There are several visible “camps” on each side of the argument, and the camps tend to produce studies supporting their viewpoint.


So of course we want to know: What does a wider, more independent view of the evidence show? A new systematic review digs into the pros and cons of “Ketogenic Diets and Ketone Supplements on the Aerobic Performance of Endurance Runners.”


Its conclusion: The evidence shows no “significant advantages or disadvantages of ketogenic diets or ketone supplements.”


The review was based on results from 12 keto studies that involved 132 endurance runners. Each of the studies included specific runner-performance measurements like vo2 max, time trials, 3-hour runs, or runs to exhaustion. 


None of the studies reported “benefits of ketogenic diets or ketone supplements on selected markers of aerobic performance.” Several of the keto studies did find a reduction in body weight while preserving muscle mass. This could be beneficial to a runner. Others noted improvement in “glycemic control,” which would enhance health.


However, no study reported improved running performance. That’s why most runners continue to follow a modestly high-carb diet, while focusing on other training or lifestyle modifications that could help them run faster. More at Sports Health.


Recent Leadville 100 Mile course-record setter and prolific podcaster David Roche has “no secrets” about his ketone program. He uses them post-exercise 3 to 4 times a week with a big meal. And again “the day before ultras.” More at Twitter/Mountain Roche including many journal references.


New Squat Technique = More Quad Strength

A research team wondered how a change in foot placement (close together vs wider apart) might change the effectiveness of the common squat. They tested two different stance widths: 0.7 acromion width vs 1.7 acromion width. 


Yeah, I scratched my head over “acromion,” too. Turns out it means “shoulder width.” Today, you get a vocabulary builder in addition to exercise tips.


In this experiment, the investigators pitted a narrow foot placement against a significantly wider one. And the narrow stance won the contest.


Result: “The wide stance resulted in statistically smaller vastii forces compared with the narrow stance.” Vastii forces refers to the quadriceps muscle group just above the knee.


Conclusion: “We suggest that recreationally trained men aiming to optimize muscle forces in the vastii muscles during maximum back squat training should consider adopting a narrow stance.”


More force should produce more muscle stimulation and growth. You can also use the results of this study to modulate your squat exercises. Perhaps you set your feet farther apart when you are injured or fatigued, and bring them closer together when you want a harder quad workout. More at J of Strength & Conditioning Research.


Another new knee study found that strength training reduces the risk of knee arthritis. It followed more than 2,600 strength training adults (56% female; average age, 64) for 8 years. 


Conclusion: “Strength training is beneficial for future knee health, counteracting long-held assumptions that strength training has adverse effects.” Indeed, individuals who engaged in strength training averaged about a 20% lower risk of developing knee osteoarthritis. More at Arthritis & Rheumatology.


Masters Runners: Beware Of “Hidden Hypertension”

Regular aerobic exercise like running lowers your risk of heart disease, but provides no bullet-proof guarantees. The same is true about hypertension (high blood pressure)--a health concern many runners overlook.


This paper observes that “Arterial hypertension defined as a blood pressure values ≥ 140/90 mmHg is one of the most common chronic diseases in the general population and also in master athletes.” 


The article also argues that masters athletes need to become more aware of “hidden hypertension” and how to “prevent its consequences.” Early detection is critical. Hidden hypertension is high blood pressure that doesn’t turn up in the doctor’s office, but perhaps at home, at work, or during your workouts when stress levels increase.


The first step: “Lifestyle changes such as healthy diet and body mass reduction.” Increasing the antioxidant foods (fruits, veggies) in your diet can lower blood pressure. But avoid anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), as they may increase blood pressure. 


If your blood pressure registers higher than 160/100 on several occasions, it’s time for prescription medical treatment. Fortunately, several common meds reduce blood pressure without affecting athletic performance. 


Conclusion: “Raising awareness of the [hypertension] risk factors is essential in preventing an increasing number of hypertensive patients.” More at Reviews in Cardiovascular Medicine with free full text.


SHORT STUFF You Don’t Want To Miss


>>> One step at a time: Henry Rueden is 74, he’s run 2000 marathons, he doesn’t seem to be tired yet. 


>>> Creatine power: In a systematic review and meta analysis, creatine supplementation helped athletes increase muscle mass and decrease body fat. 


>>> Is running bad for your skin? Could be. There’s sweat, blisters, and of course skin cancer. So cover up, and use protective balms.


GREAT QUOTES Make Great Training Partners


“I always say: A run in the morning is like eating a fruit a day. It chases the doctor away.”

--Eliud Kipchoge, two-time Olympic Marathon champ


That’s all for now. Thanks for reading. RLRH will not be published next week. The next edition will appear the second week of October. Amby


September 5, 2024

Hot Tip: How Micro-Periodization Leads To Max Performance

Everyone knows that you can’t train hard every day. As a result, we have developed many varieties of “periodization” in training.


The simplest works like this: Alternate hard days and easy days. Some would say, “Take two easy days after every hard day.” (Or three, or … ???) Your age and fitness determine the number of recovery days you need.


Marathon coaches and runners often take entire “cutback weeks” during their 12- to 16-week buildups. These allow you to build your weekly mileage and long-run distance without hitting the wall pre-race. I’ve always supported this schema.


However, new technologies might provide a better way. Instead of using heavy-handed, non-physiological math to determine training patterns--take a cutback week once every month--you could monitor your stress-fatigue more precisely.


That’s the argument made in a recent editorial on “the new frontier of micro periodization for endurance.” The authors, a team of endurance-training experts, believe that older periodization systems are wasteful and limiting.


Why? Because they ask athletes to take too many easy days that aren’t necessary according to daily biological data. Instead, if body measurements say, “I’m good to go,” the athlete can train hard. Even if (s)he trained hard the previous day.


In this system, you forget about the calendar. Instead, you use objective tools like heart rate variability, sleep, muscle-damage enzymes, and hormone fluctuations. These can help you “eliminate unnecessary unloading weeks, which entail an unjustified reduction in training load.”


The authors believe this system allows for “maximizing the training load and achievable adaptations” while also limiting injuries and overtraining.


Conclusion: “Microperiodization emerges as a new frontier in periodization of endurance disciplines.” This is indeed an exciting new frontier. 


At the same time, I still like cutback weeks.  If you’re not aiming for Olympic gold or a Marathon Majors win, it’s better to be safe than sorry. More at The J of Sports Medicine & Physical Fitness. More details in this great podcast at KoopCast.


What’s The Best High Intensity Workout For Runners?

There’s much to be said for a simple training plan. You learn what works well for you, and you return to certain key workouts as necessary.


Such a plan would have to include at least one high-intensity workout every week or two. This doesn’t have to be a killer, all-out session. There’s no requirement that you must puke under the grandstands.


But the workout should push you to perhaps 90 percent of your max, and leave you near that level for 20 to 30 minutes. Many runners and coaches describe the required effort as “hard but controlled.” I’ve always liked that phrasing.


Over at Reddit, the advanced running group recently discussed t the “single best high intensity workout” for runners. There was considerable support for multiple repeats of 1000-meter intervals--often 6 to 8 repeats at your 10K to half-marathon race pace.


These are similar to Yasso 800s, where you run 8 to 10 repeats at the same time (in minutes:seconds) as your goal marathon time (in hours:minutes). If you’re aiming for a 3:45 marathon, you run your Yasso 800s in 3 minutes, 45 seconds each.


Other runners favored mile repeats--a classic distance formula. And some leaned more toward 2-mile repeats.


An interesting trend I didn’t expect: Most of these runners seemed to prefer the precision of track running over the tempo runs (on the road) many marathoners do. If you like to break away from the track, you can always try “Moose fartlek.” More at Reddit.


Face It: Strange Facial Expressions Can Boost Endurance

Top U.S. distance runner Colleen Quigley, a 2016 Olympian in the steeplechase, caused more than a few raised eyebrows with a recent post on Instagram. She shared a video of herself doing a tongue-pulling exercise intended to relieve tension in the pelvis. This, in turn, improves her running.


Quigley does this tongue-pulling before hard workouts and races. “1000% the weirdest muscle release I’ve ever done, but I swear it works,” she wrote. 


Most respondents got a good laugh from the unusual reel, while a few said they had done the same thing in their operatic careers, or when working with horses. 


Here’s an explanatory article on Quigley’s tongue exercise with a link to the original Instagram post. I couldn’t find any evidence-based support for Quigley’s practice, but that doesn’t mean none exists. Some in the strength-training world advocate that that tongue placement in the mouth--towards the roof of the mouth vs lower--affects muscle performance. 


Quigley reminded me of faces I’ve seen among Maori rugby players. I think a bit of tongue pulling and haka on road race starting lines could liven things up a bit. 


In addition, we’ve heard that a smile can help you run faster. Also, we’ve all seen runners wearing nasal strips, while some research has supported jaw-repositioning mouthguards “for performance enhancement in both aerobic and anaerobic performances.” Maybe the face, tongue, and jaw deserve more attention.



Don’t Be Carb-Smart And Carb-Dumb At The Same Time

Most endurance runners understand that carbohydrates are their friend. (There are a few runners, but not many, sticking to the keto-diet approach--probably more in ultramarathoning than in Olympic distances like the 5000 meters to marathon.)


But it’s not enough to be well-read and well-educated. You also have to put your understanding to good use. And many runners fail to do that.


A new paper investigated, for the first time in the scientific literature, the link between knowledge and practice among 50 endurance athletes (37 female) who competed in events lasting longer than 2.5 hours. Outcome: There was “no relationship between the knowledge of CHO recommendations and practice.”


Seems incredible, right? I admit I was surprised. Especially when you consider that over half the subjects had worked with a registered sports nutritionist. 


Here’s how the research was performed. All athletes began by taking a test to assess their understanding of carbohydrates for endurance success. They also reported their food consumption for 24 hours before a long race, and in the race itself. “No attempt was made to influence or alter race nutrition practices throughout the course of this study.”


Result: Only 10 percent of subjects met the carb loading guidelines in practice. Many more, 80%, got their pre-competition meal right. But only 19 percent consumed enough carbs during their race.


What happened here? What backfired? The researchers offered several reasonable hypotheses. The subjects probably didn’t plan precisely enough for their meals away from home (at the race location), worried about upset-stomach issues, and/or had a “fear of carbohydrates” related to weight gain.


Whatever the reasons, the lesson is clear. It’s not enough that you know what you’re supposed to eat and drink before and during endurance races. You also need a solid plan to make sure you follow through on carbohydrate recommendations. More at European J of Sport Sciences with free full text.


5 Evidence-Based Tips For Run-Walk Training 

I’ve been using the run-walk method of training for the last 20 years, and I’m still learning new variations. Once you get over the big psychological hurdle--yes, it’s okay to take walk breaks on your runs, even if you are a “serious” runner--the world of training for running opens up. It begins to provide many previously unseen possibilities. 


Here’s my latest experiment: I’m completing my basic 6-mile and 10-mile training efforts with a relaxed 3:1 run:walk ratio for the first two-thirds of the distance. I had been using a 4:1 ratio for 2 decades, so this represents a slowdown. But, hey, I’m getting older every day, so cut me a break. 


The new wrinkle: I’m now all-running the last one-third of the distance at either my half-marathon pace (on the 6-milers) or my marathon pace (on the 10-milers). Neither of these all-run paces are fast, but they are medium hard and steady. And they represent my goal paces for my biggest annual races.


So far, so good. Maybe I’ll let you know more after an upcoming marathon. In the meantime, here’s a solid, evidence-based article about the potential benefits of run-walk training. These are particularly useful for aging runners, and those returning to running after injury or a long layoff. More at Performance Lab. 


5 Ways To Lower Triathlon Training Injuries (inc. Bike Accidents)

Triathletes get overuse running injuries just as all runners do. However, their injury risks are likely lowered by a total fitness training program that includes plenty of cycling and swimming. 


Of course, cycling is a big problem, because falls and accidents cause traumatic injuries. They can require a long recovery period.


Here a Spanish research team studied 28 of the country’s top triathletes for 3 years. They put the subjects on a Holistic [Injury] Training Program (HITP). It included 5 components that “were worked on continuously throughout the season.” 


The components were: strength training, training load control, session development control, bike skills training, and physiotherapy treatment. The researchers then measured injuries during the 3 years.


Result: All told, the researchers noted 24 injuries over the 3-year period. Fourteen were traumatic injuries, and only 10 overuse injuries. Among the triathlete-subjects, 46% had no injuries, and 71% had no overuse injuries. Men suffered significantly more numerous and severe traumatic injuries, while women tended to have more overuse injuries.


Conclusion: “The main findings were that the implementation of an HITP resulted in low injury incidence (and particularly overuse injury incidence).” More at Sports with free full text.


Which Is Better: Caffeine Or Sodium Bicarbonate?

Runners and other endurance athletes are experimenting with ever more supplements, hoping to find legal ones that will provide a boost in performance. Caffeine is a perennial favorite, and well-proven. Sodium bicarbonate is a relatively recent one, now available in new formulations.


It’s reasonable to wonder how each affects performance individually, and how things change if someone takes both before a big event.


That’s the question addressed in this new paper, which used a strong double-blind, cross-over design. The performance measure was an isometric mid-thigh pull (IMTP)--not exactly a running time-trial, but a thigh muscle test “which has gained significant popularity in recent years.”


Subjects performed the IMTP 60 minutes after receiving: 1) nothing; 2) a placebo; 3) caffeine; 4) sodium bicarbonate; or 5) a combination of caffeine and sodium bicarbonate. They never knew which of the preparations they had received.


Result: Caffeine, taken alone, “positively affects submaximal strength performance.” There was no such improvement for any of the other conditions.


Therefore, on this IMTP test, it appears that sodium bicarbonate doesn’t provide any performance advantage. Indeed, if combined with caffeine, sodium bicarb erases caffeine’s benefit. More at Sports with free full text.


Complete Guide To Headwinds & Tailwinds

We runners love tailwinds and hate headwinds. There’s a good scientific explanation for this, as performance PhD and blogger John Davis points out here.


He writes: “A headwind will slow you down by two or three times as much as the equivalent tailwind will speed you up.” So whenever you qualify for the Boston Marathon, you’d better hope you don’t get a headwind blowing against you from the East.


On the other hand, a circular urban marathon can give you some protection from the wind. Davis says: “In a dense urban area, the actual wind speed you encounter might be less than half the nominal wind speed measured by a weather station.”


His article on tailwinds and headwinds is longer, more technical, and more mathematical than most will care to read in full. But you can jump down to his “Recap” for the summary. Then you’ll want to head over to his amazing Calculator. 


First, set it to your expected running pace in minutes/mile (other units available). The default wind is a headwind, which you can adjust with the < > buttons. To see the effect of a tailwind, grab the blue wind infographic (set at “N” for north) with your cursor, and rotate it to “S.” Now you can play with various tailwinds.


In either case, the Calculator instantly adjusts your pace depending on the headwind or tailwind you selected. It’s a very clever tool.


You can’t do much to change the winds you encounter on race day. But this tool makes it easy to adjust race outcomes, if you want. It also helps you understand why drafting makes a difference, since it cuts down headwinds. More at Running Writings.


SHORT STUFF You Don’t Want To Miss

>>> Lacking confidence? Some runners suffer from a sort of “imposter syndrome” that limits their potential. Here’s how to surmount that hurdle.


>>> Healthy heart advice: A big U.S. study shows that boosting your aerobic fitness gives you a heart age 20 years younger than the unfit.


>>> Which comes first? Athletes often wonder if they should do cardio workouts before strength, or vice versa. A review of 15 big studies concluded: “The sequence of concurrent training is not of great importance” for endurance. However, 14 of the 15 found that it IS important to do both, no matter the order.


GREAT QUOTES Make Great Training Partners

“If you feel bad at 10 miles, you’re in trouble. If you feel bad at 20 miles, you’re normal. If you don’t feel bad at 26 miles, you’re abnormal.” 

– Rob de Castella, former Australian marathon great and Boston Marathon winner


That’s all for now. Thanks for reading. See you again next week. Amby